<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Learn231</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learn231.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Learning is not Linear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Education Technology Trends by Appropriate Access to Technology &#171; Education 2.0</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Appropriate Access to Technology &#171; Education 2.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Unknown (2011). &#8220;Education Technology Trends &#8221; Learning is not Linear. Retrieved Oct 6th, 2012, from http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1/. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unknown (2011). &#8220;Education Technology Trends &#8221; Learning is not Linear. Retrieved Oct 6th, 2012, from <a href="http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1/" rel="nofollow">http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1/</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating OER in Teaching and Learning by Maira</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/integrating-oer-in-teaching-and-learning/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/integrating-oer-in-teaching-and-learning/#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can certainly see your skills in the article you write.
The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you 
who aren&#039;t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can certainly see your skills in the article you write.<br />
The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you<br />
who aren&#8217;t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catalyst for Change&#8230;Access Copyright and Education by ebrownorama</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/catalyst-for-change-access-copyright-and-education/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ebrownorama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stu, I agree with you that awareness is one benefit that happens when a change is made. Some people didn&#039;t even know that a process, etc., existed until it is taken away from them. That forces those affected by the change to take a look at their practices and find an alternate method. Hopefully there are options to provide improvement due to the change. Specifically, you mention that different teaching/learning approaches be used such as inquiry learning, personalized learning, collaboration and student publishing to authentic audience. These are excellent methods for students to have the opportunity for improved learning and afterall, isn&#039;t that the bottom line?
Thanks for sharing.
Eva]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stu, I agree with you that awareness is one benefit that happens when a change is made. Some people didn&#8217;t even know that a process, etc., existed until it is taken away from them. That forces those affected by the change to take a look at their practices and find an alternate method. Hopefully there are options to provide improvement due to the change. Specifically, you mention that different teaching/learning approaches be used such as inquiry learning, personalized learning, collaboration and student publishing to authentic audience. These are excellent methods for students to have the opportunity for improved learning and afterall, isn&#8217;t that the bottom line?<br />
Thanks for sharing.<br />
Eva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Education Technology Trends by eLearning@Ed Conference 2012 LiveBlog &#187; Nicola Osborne</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eLearning@Ed Conference 2012 LiveBlog &#187; Nicola Osborne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Trends (http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1). In the 2012 Horizon report we&#8217;ve seen mobiles and e-books highlights. In Leicester the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trends (<a href="http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1" rel="nofollow">http://learn231.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/trend-report-1</a>). In the 2012 Horizon report we&#8217;ve seen mobiles and e-books highlights. In Leicester the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OER and Sustainability by plerudulier</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/oer-and-sustainability/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plerudulier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=281#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://thingsigrab.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/5954/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Things I grab, motley collection &lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://thingsigrab.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/5954/" rel="nofollow">Things I grab, motley collection </a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OER and Sustainability by damoclarky</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/oer-and-sustainability/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damoclarky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=281#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just posted a comment to Vincent&#039;s blog making the comment that the K-12 context is probably a nice fit for the development of OERs across a district.  What you described was what I thought would be productive and sustainable.  But alas I did not consider the political side of the equation.  Rationalisation of funding by governments can often be short-sighted and unfortunate.  I particularly like the fact that teachers from the district were seconded to develop the resources, rather than bringing external parties in.  In a modern-day implementation using social technology, it is not hard to envision a re-emergence of such an initiative and in a more effective way.  A colleague of mine often makes the comment that initiatives of this type of often more effective when they aren&#039;t institutionalised, meaning that when they are adopted from the ground up in an organic and evolutionary way, they can often side-step the overarching managerialism that embodies what has happened in your district.  Perhaps now is an opportune time to see if you can gather even a small group of interested colleagues and starting sharing resources between schools again.  It is surprising how such news can spread and people emerge wanting to participate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a comment to Vincent&#8217;s blog making the comment that the K-12 context is probably a nice fit for the development of OERs across a district.  What you described was what I thought would be productive and sustainable.  But alas I did not consider the political side of the equation.  Rationalisation of funding by governments can often be short-sighted and unfortunate.  I particularly like the fact that teachers from the district were seconded to develop the resources, rather than bringing external parties in.  In a modern-day implementation using social technology, it is not hard to envision a re-emergence of such an initiative and in a more effective way.  A colleague of mine often makes the comment that initiatives of this type of often more effective when they aren&#8217;t institutionalised, meaning that when they are adopted from the ground up in an organic and evolutionary way, they can often side-step the overarching managerialism that embodies what has happened in your district.  Perhaps now is an opportune time to see if you can gather even a small group of interested colleagues and starting sharing resources between schools again.  It is surprising how such news can spread and people emerge wanting to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catalyst for Change&#8230;Access Copyright and Education by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/catalyst-for-change-access-copyright-and-education/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You shared an interesting perspective Stu, by viewing the cancellation of the Access Copyright agreement by the University of Manitoba in a positive light. 

Following your link I came across this statement from Joanne Keselman (shared in the article by Sarah Petz):  that in lieu of renewing the agreement, the university will use its funds to “modernize” their resources and services “rather than perpetuating the antiquated relationship with Access Copyright,”

Initially it seemed that this increase would cause issues for students and staff, but after reading your post I was pleased to see this response from the university. 

A move towards collaborative learning, as shared in your post, would incorporate the use of online resources (most of which are already available) and this would definitely keep costs down. Resource-based learning, another example provided in your post, would undoubtedly merge well with learning that utilizes online resources and OER. 

From the link you shared I found the following on the role of the teacher: “Provide a reason for students to gather information by developing a question or problem, based on a curriculum topic…”

The end goal seems to be developing the networked learner. 

Thanks for sharing your ideas. 

Jonathan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shared an interesting perspective Stu, by viewing the cancellation of the Access Copyright agreement by the University of Manitoba in a positive light. </p>
<p>Following your link I came across this statement from Joanne Keselman (shared in the article by Sarah Petz):  that in lieu of renewing the agreement, the university will use its funds to “modernize” their resources and services “rather than perpetuating the antiquated relationship with Access Copyright,”</p>
<p>Initially it seemed that this increase would cause issues for students and staff, but after reading your post I was pleased to see this response from the university. </p>
<p>A move towards collaborative learning, as shared in your post, would incorporate the use of online resources (most of which are already available) and this would definitely keep costs down. Resource-based learning, another example provided in your post, would undoubtedly merge well with learning that utilizes online resources and OER. </p>
<p>From the link you shared I found the following on the role of the teacher: “Provide a reason for students to gather information by developing a question or problem, based on a curriculum topic…”</p>
<p>The end goal seems to be developing the networked learner. </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your ideas. </p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Source Creation by Aidawany</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/week-4-post-open-source-creation/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aidawany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://aida313.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/29/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Secrets &amp; Lies&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
thank you. 
credits to learn231.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://aida313.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/29/" rel="nofollow">Secrets &amp; Lies</a> and commented:<br />
thank you.<br />
credits to learn231.wordpress.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Consideration of Accessibility? by damoclarky</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/in-consideration-of-accessibility/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damoclarky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=273#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must admit that I have rarely considered accessibility in the work that I have published online in the past.  I had not heard of a screen-reader until I met a blind person who was using it some years ago.  Quite a clever piece of technology I thought at the time, but thwarted to a certain extent without the appropriate guidelines with meta-data to make the screen-reader much more effective.  There is a fellow whom I know of who is bound to a wheel-chair, and yet from what I understand, his work is exemplary amongst his peers.  It is easy to overlook accessibility when publishing to a deadline and it is a shame when it may exclude minority groups on the basis of disability.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit that I have rarely considered accessibility in the work that I have published online in the past.  I had not heard of a screen-reader until I met a blind person who was using it some years ago.  Quite a clever piece of technology I thought at the time, but thwarted to a certain extent without the appropriate guidelines with meta-data to make the screen-reader much more effective.  There is a fellow whom I know of who is bound to a wheel-chair, and yet from what I understand, his work is exemplary amongst his peers.  It is easy to overlook accessibility when publishing to a deadline and it is a shame when it may exclude minority groups on the basis of disability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Consideration of Accessibility? by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://learn231.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/in-consideration-of-accessibility/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn231.wordpress.com/?p=273#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stu,

It seems that this does indeed come down to a &quot;moral&quot; decision as outside of the federal and provincial government and the other organizational types you listed, users do not have to make their content accessible to all.

Perhaps, if viewers put more pressure on the creator, ensuring that he or she made certain of the accessibility for all users, then we would see more progress. This could be done via reviews of the Open Education Resource by the viewers (and online community). For example, the more accessible the resource was the more credibility it would gain.

Another option for change: is if members of the community championed this cause and edited the work of others, to make it more accessible. More training is needed in order to afford all users the technical skills required to do this. I am certain that society would not be able to rely on others but rather should empower each content creator with the skills to make his or her content accessible to all.

In our next discussion, our group might be able to determine useful learning resources for this purpose. Thanks for sharing your findings. I enjoyed reading your post.

Jonathan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stu,</p>
<p>It seems that this does indeed come down to a &#8220;moral&#8221; decision as outside of the federal and provincial government and the other organizational types you listed, users do not have to make their content accessible to all.</p>
<p>Perhaps, if viewers put more pressure on the creator, ensuring that he or she made certain of the accessibility for all users, then we would see more progress. This could be done via reviews of the Open Education Resource by the viewers (and online community). For example, the more accessible the resource was the more credibility it would gain.</p>
<p>Another option for change: is if members of the community championed this cause and edited the work of others, to make it more accessible. More training is needed in order to afford all users the technical skills required to do this. I am certain that society would not be able to rely on others but rather should empower each content creator with the skills to make his or her content accessible to all.</p>
<p>In our next discussion, our group might be able to determine useful learning resources for this purpose. Thanks for sharing your findings. I enjoyed reading your post.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
